Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-pic - Re: [wg-pic] Comments Requested: PIC Working Group Project Proposal

Subject: Presence and IntComm WG

List archive

Re: [wg-pic] Comments Requested: PIC Working Group Project Proposal


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre <>
  • To: Dennis Baron <>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: [wg-pic] Comments Requested: PIC Working Group Project Proposal
  • Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:14:54 +0100
  • Jabber-id:
  • Organization: XMPP Standards Foundation

Dennis Baron wrote:
It's important to put some thought into "smart federation". Different organizations deploy these technologies in different ways. We have a very open federation model on the open XMPP network, but we have also recently deployed an intermediate certification authority that issues free digitial certificates to server admins, which you folks are welcome to use (perhaps accept connections only from other entities that have certificates). Another model would be for Internet2 to run its own CA. Another model might be used in say the financial industry, where business level agreements would be hammered out in advance between companies that want to interoperate. But it seems to me that the old "we'll connect with anyone" model of email is simply unacceptable these days, and that organizations want to federate in a more intelligent fashion this time around (i.e., for real-time communication).

I think it would be great for the group to discuss this and recommend
a model (if you'd be willing to join that would be great!). I'm not
sure another CA is needed. (Which reminds me - I need to check w/JIS
to see why jis.mit.edu has a certificate but mit.edu doesn't :-) !)

I'm not sure we should abandon the "we'll connect with anyone" model
altogether. But I think organizations should authenticate any
communications that comes from them.

What do you mean by "authenticate" in this context?

And users should be able to
decide who can communicate with them, how, and when.

Sure. We mostly already do that via the buddy list. A more formal approach is here:

http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0155.html

But that's just
my model - I'm interested in others' thoughts. For cases like the
financial industry there may be a need for company control over who
can "talk" to whom - but I hope that universities will not find that
necessary.

Agreed.

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation
http://www.xmpp.org/xsf/people/stpeter.shtml

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page