Presence and IntComm WG

[Deke Kassabian <>]

--On Friday, April 9, 2004 3:20 PM -0400 Jeremy George 
<> wrote:

>   In general I think this is an excellent compromise and I agree
> completely with the analysis of the value proposition for the trial.  The
> PIC group is primarily about the integration of computer-mediated computer
> communications components rather than the components individually.
> Dropping VoIP shouldn't, necessarily, be a deal breaker.
>
>   If we agree (I'm soliciting other opinions) to this proposal, we need
> to nail down UA installation as simple as possible and do some quick
> work on whatever mailing we send out.
>
>   Some questions:
>
>   This clearly affects Session.  What do we do?

Right.  Couldn't we still encourage those interested in audio and video
conferencing to try Session, not as part of the Location Services demo
but as part of IC in general?  The message is "Here's a quality, cross
platform tool that does audio and video conferencing well, and may do
SIMPLE-based IM soon."

Jeff from WaveThree is probably listening in, right?
Jeff?  What do you think.

On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Jamey Hicks wrote:
> > I think
> > that a BOF for trying out VOIP as well would also be a good thing.
> >
> > -Jamey

So do more focused voice communications as part of a separate gathering?

^Deke

-------
Deke Kassabian,  Senior Technology Director
Information Systems and Computing, Networking and Telecommunications
University of Pennsylvania   <URL:http://www.net.isc.upenn.edu/~deke>