wg-multicast - The state of interdomain multicast - ?
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: "Garry Peirce" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: The state of interdomain multicast - ?
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:57:30 -0500
Using the frequency of messages on this list and working SAP entries as a rudimentary gauge, the level of interdomain v4 multicast work/content seems low (not to mention v6 which is not yet possible for us). I believe that mcast has still yet to realize its value and I’m curious in hearing how others view and use inter/intradomain mcast. Mcast can be R&E differentiating value-add among ourselves and our participants. To give insight into our use, as a unit of the University System, Networkmaine operates Maine’s statewide network (K-20, Research, Libraries, Public Service). Within the University System, we currently make internal production use of v4 mcast for ITV distance learning (including ~20 K12 sites) and on scattered wired subnets as needed for disk imaging. IPTV of commercial content is a wishful thought, but with cableTV services contracted/maintained by other entities , raising interest tends to be an uphill battle. With the tiny amount of IPTV test content we enable, there’s little awareness of it. On a side note, a growing mobile population will require wireless mcast support which I’ve current reservations about (ex. source control). Although not for a lack in trying, mcast peering with MaineREN participants is currently non-existent – they see it as desirable but have had no time to devote to it. What’s really missing is content. I believe R&Es contain a wealth of potential content ; content that could be shared to wider audiences via mcast. We’ve started an (unfunded) grass roots effort to cast live consented public events. The thought was to try and promote multicast within our R&E statenet as well as to share such events to wider audiences among it and beyond. Our recent live events can be seen here , with more on the way. I’d be happy to share further info/experience about the effort for any that may be interested. I recently saw a message that I2 JointTech conference is contemplating doing away with mcast sessions in lieu of unicast. I’d be interested in understanding it if someone on the list is aware, as I would think that too bad should that occur. I wonder if that might be due to shallow interdomain mcast acceptance, or that R&E BW growth decreases the need for a more efficient (albeit more complex) transport, or perhaps to provide it within an interactive environment. Losing any interdomain mcast content will further decrease usage. Being personally interested in the content, it’s helpful to not only verify the mcast infrastructure but to use as example of how the service can be beneficial. Believing that part of an R&E network’s role is to test/develop the network itself, it’d actually be nice to see it via v6 mcast. Appreciate any others’ thoughts/insights. |
Attachment:
Garry Peirce.vcf
Description: Binary data
- The state of interdomain multicast - ?, Garry Peirce, 02/24/2011
- Re: The state of interdomain multicast - ?, Ge Moua, 02/24/2011
- Re: The state of interdomain multicast - ?, Curtis, Bruce, 02/25/2011
- RE: The state of interdomain multicast - ?, Garry Peirce, 02/27/2011
- RE: The state of interdomain multicast - ?, Leonard Giuliano, 02/28/2011
- Re: The state of interdomain multicast - ?, Alan Buxey, 02/24/2011
- Re: The state of interdomain multicast - ?, Curtis, Bruce, 02/25/2011
- Re: The state of interdomain multicast - ?, Leonard Giuliano, 02/25/2011
- Re: The state of interdomain multicast - ?, Marc Manthey, 02/26/2011
- Re: The state of interdomain multicast - ?, Leonard Giuliano, 02/28/2011
- Re: The state of interdomain multicast - ?, Ray Soucy, 02/26/2011
- Re: The state of interdomain multicast - ?, Marc Manthey, 02/26/2011
- Re: The state of interdomain multicast - ?, Ge Moua, 02/24/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.