Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-multicast - RE: OSX IGMPv3/SSM woes..

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

RE: OSX IGMPv3/SSM woes..


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Tony Ballardie" <>
  • To: "Alan Crosswell" <>
  • Cc: "Dan Pritts" <>, "Greg Shepherd" <>, "Pekka Savola" <>, "wg-multicast" <>, "Tom Pusateri" <>
  • Subject: RE: OSX IGMPv3/SSM woes..
  • Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:02:49 +0100

Agreed. (I meant it's no time to give up on inter-domain multicast btw,
in case anyone interpreted that as "no time to give up on ASM") :)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Crosswell
> [mailto:]
> Sent: 24 October 2008 13:00
> To: Tony Ballardie
> Cc: Dan Pritts; Greg Shepherd; Pekka Savola; wg-multicast; Tom
Pusateri
> Subject: Re: OSX IGMPv3/SSM woes..
>
> Rate-limiting MSDP means you may lose useful, low update frequency,l
> SAs that are buried in the noise.
>
> ASM must die.
> /a
>
> On Oct 24, 2008, at 6:17 AM, "Tony Ballardie"
> <Tony.Ballardie@global-
> mix.com
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >> From: Dan Pritts
> >> [mailto:]
> >> Sent: 23 October 2008 21:34
> >>
> >>> After all, 1) ASM works,
> >>
> >> Arguably, ASM does not work.
> >>
> >> I've certainly had problems on my network due to MSDP storms
> >> and the SAP storm we saw recently.
> >
> > ASM works provided it's configured properly (like anything else) and
> > you
> > rate-limit msdp. Unless you're talking about bugs which do break its
> > correct operation, it's misleading to suggest it doesn't work.
That's
> > NOT to say we shouldn't be moving towards SSM - we definitely
SHOULD.
> >
> >> IMO, Going forward we'll be faced with a choice between SSM and
> >> giving
> >> up on
> >> interdomain multicast.
> >
> > It's not time to give up on it.... quite the opposite :-)
> >
> > Tony
> >
> >



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page