wg-multicast - Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: Yuri Kolomiyets <>
- To: Pekka Savola <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:29:09 -0400
Pekka Savola wrote:
Do you mean that it works for a while and then stops (the first timeout) or that it doesn't work to begin with?I just retested with SPT disabled on both HP and Cisco. By disabled i mean I added "ip pim spt-threshold infinity" on the Cisco side. and "no spt-threshold" to the router pim part of the HP.
Here's the behaviour i'm seeing:
Source still joins shows up in the SPT on Cisco.
(10.0.3.2, 239.255.100.100), 00:01:09/00:02:52, flags: PT
Incoming interface: Vlan30, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
Outgoing interface list: Null
When receiver joins behind HP router, here's what i'm seeing:
*Mar 4 03:04:50.815: PIM(0): Received v2 Join/Prune on GigabitEthernet1/0/24 from 10.0.0.2, to us
*Mar 4 03:04:50.815: PIM(0): Join-list: (*, 239.255.100.100), RPT-bit set, WC-bit set, S-bit set
*Mar 4 03:04:50.815: PIM(0): Add GigabitEthernet1/0/24/10.0.0.2 to (*, 239.255.100.100), Forward state, by PIM *G Join
*Mar 4 03:04:50.815: PIM(0): Add GigabitEthernet1/0/24/10.0.0.2 to (10.0.3.2, 239.255.100.100), Forward state, by PIM *G Jon
Then it works until the first timeout, and then stops and never resumes again. The trace shows:
*Mar 4 03:05:50.810: PIM(0): Received v2 Join/Prune on GigabitEthernet1/0/24 from 10.0.0.2, to us
*Mar 4 03:05:50.810: PIM(0): Join-list: (*, 239.255.100.100), RPT-bit set, WC-bit set, S-bit set
*Mar 4 03:05:50.810: PIM(0): Update GigabitEthernet1/0/24/10.0.0.2 to (*, 239.255.100.100), Forward state, by PIM *G Join
*Mar 4 03:05:50.810: PIM(0): Prune-list: (10.0.3.2/32, 239.255.100.100) RPT-bit set
*Mar 4 03:05:50.810: PIM(0): Prune GigabitEthernet1/0/24/239.255.100.100 from (10.0.3.2/32, 239.255.100.100) - deleted
*Mar 4 03:06:50.814: PIM(0): Received v2 Join/Prune on GigabitEthernet1/0/24 from 10.0.0.2, to us
*Mar 4 03:06:50.814: PIM(0): Join-list: (*, 239.255.100.100), RPT-bit set, WC-bit set, S-bit set
*Mar 4 03:06:50.814: PIM(0): Update GigabitEthernet1/0/24/10.0.0.2 to (*, 239.255.100.100), Forward state, by PIM *G Join
*Mar 4 03:06:50.814: PIM(0): Prune-list: (10.0.3.2/32, 239.255.100.100) RPT-bit set
If the latter, the problem might also be in Cisco and you might want to check out that RPT state exists on Cisco and it's sending out the traffic to HP on the RPT state. If it does do that, then I guess HP just doesn't know to handle the traffic/RPT state and the ball is clearly on their court?So as you said, the former is the case: works till the first timeout after the initial join with SPT switch disabled on HP. I'm still not sure why Cisco puts it in the SPT istead of RPT since I did set the SPT threshold to infinity, but I don't think that's what causing the problem.
If the former, it's likely that the problems are in HP. There are probably many, the first of which is why is RPT join failing to refresh in a timely manner. As Marshall hinted, one may have to check out if IGMP membership reports / timeouts coincide with that (i.e., if the DR loses IGMP state, it'll prune or not refresh the state), though I suppose that shouldn't be a problem in this particular case.
It seems to me that it's a bug in HP and instead of putting the S,G in the join list with RPT-bit set, they are putting it in the prune list. Does that sound about right?
--
Yuri Kolomiyets
Network Services
Information Systems & Technology
University of Waterloo
E-mail:
Phone: (519) 888-4567 x36999
- Re: Looking for multicast sources, (continued)
- Re: Looking for multicast sources, Frank Fulchiero, 09/05/2007
- Re: Looking for multicast sources, Dan Oachs, 09/05/2007
- Re: Looking for multicast sources, THOMAS, PHIL, 09/05/2007
- Re: Looking for multicast sources, Jimmy Kyriannis, 09/06/2007
- HP to Cisco PIM problem, Yuri Kolomiyets, 09/21/2007
- Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem, Marshall Eubanks, 09/21/2007
- Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem, Yuri Kolomiyets, 09/21/2007
- Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem, Pekka Savola, 09/21/2007
- Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem, Yuri Kolomiyets, 09/21/2007
- Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem, Pekka Savola, 09/21/2007
- Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem, Yuri Kolomiyets, 09/21/2007
- Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem, Pekka Savola, 09/21/2007
- Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem, Yuri Kolomiyets, 09/21/2007
- Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem, Pekka Savola, 09/21/2007
- Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem, Yuri Kolomiyets, 09/21/2007
- Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem, Pekka Savola, 09/21/2007
- Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem, Yuri Kolomiyets, 09/21/2007
- Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem, Bruce Campbell, 09/21/2007
- Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem, David Farmer, 09/21/2007
- Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem, Bruce Campbell, 09/21/2007
- Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem, David Farmer, 09/21/2007
- Re: HP to Cisco PIM problem, Marshall Eubanks, 09/21/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.