wg-multicast - Re: Options for a multicast exchange point
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: Greg Shepherd <>
- To: Dino Farinacci <>
- Cc: <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>
- Subject: Re: Options for a multicast exchange point
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
Agreed, but I was responding to the thread title. =)
Greg
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Dino Farinacci wrote:
> >> It's a safe bet to assume the members at a MIX run their own PIM domains.
> >> If so, then only (S,G) joins will cross the mix.
>
> Yes, but does an enterprise switch box just build product for a MIX.
> Foundry's are deployed in corporate nets too with this problem to solve.
> And shared-trees are used in those environments.
>
> Dino
>
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, (continued)
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Toerless Eckert, 06/13/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Hugh LaMaster, 06/11/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Simon Leinen, 06/12/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Marshall Eubanks, 06/12/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Dino Farinacci, 06/12/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Nitin jain, 06/13/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Dino Farinacci, 06/12/2001
- Message not available
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Bill Nickless, 06/12/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Marshall Eubanks, 06/12/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Alan Crosswell, 06/11/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Marshall Eubanks, 06/12/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Dino Farinacci, 06/12/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Greg Shepherd, 06/12/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.