wg-multicast - Re: Options for a multicast exchange point
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: Marshall Eubanks <>
- To: Simon Leinen <>
- Cc: Bill Nickless <>, , , Nitin jain <>
- Subject: Re: Options for a multicast exchange point
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:01:50 -0400
- Organization: Multicast Technologies
Simon Leinen wrote:
>
> >>>>> "bn" == Bill Nickless
> >>>>> <>
> >>>>> writes:
> > PIM-SM SNOOPING/SPOOFING ETHERNET SWITCH
> > ========================================
> > Consider a Gigabit/10-Gigabit Ethernet switch that is PIM aware. It
> > could set up appropriate hardware forwarding based on the PIM Joins
> > sent between pairs. Note that the hardware forwarding would have to
> > maintain separate (S,G) packet replication states for each peer that
> > has been asked for data by some other peer. That is, the exchange
> > point switch won't get to pick an RPF towards each (S,G), so it will
> > have to maintain separate (S,G,RPF-port) states with distinct output
> > interface lists.
>
> > Benefits: - Peers get traffic only for (S,G)s they care about
> > - Peers send only one copy of traffic for (S,G)s and
> > the exchange point does the packet replication.
> > - Peers get to choose (by their own policy) the best
> > RPF for a given (S,G).
>
> > Drawbacks: - Not yet available in the marketplace (to my knowledge).
>
> Foundry does this starting with their software release 7.02.01.
> It seems to look only at the Gs, not at the (S,G)s(?).
> >From the release notes:
That is correct. Of course, an interdomain PIM snooping switch
should only look at (S,G), so this could lead to unwanted traffic, but
it's better than simple flooding.
I believe that Nitin Jain of Foundry has plans to implement full (S,G)
snooping in the near future.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
>
> PIM SM Traffic Snooping
>
> By default, when a Foundry Layer 2 Switch receives an IP multicast
> packet, the device does not examine the multicast information in
> the packet. Instead, the device simply forwards the packet out all
> ports except the port that received the packet. In some networks,
> this method can cause unnecessary traffic overhead in the
> network. For example, if the Foundry Layer 2 Switch is attached to
> only one group source and two group receivers, but has devices
> attached to every port, the Layer 2 Switch forwards group traffic
> out all ports in the same broadcast domain except the port
> attached to the source, even though there are only two receivers
> for the group.
>
> PIM SM traffic snooping eliminates the superfluous traffic by
> configuring the Layer 2 Switch to forward IP multicast group
> traffic only on the ports that are attached to receivers for the
> group.
>
> PIM SM traffic snooping requires IP multicast traffic reduction to
> be enabled on the device. IP multicast traffic reduction
> configures the device to listen for IGMP messages. PIM SM traffic
> snooping provides a finer level of multicast traffic control by
> configuring the device to listen specifically for PIM SM join and
> prune messages sent from one PIM SM router to another through the
> Layer 2 Switch.
>
> NOTE: This feature applies only to PIM SM version 2 (PIM V2).
>
> [...]
> --
> Simon.
--
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
Multicast Technologies, Inc.
10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 410
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Phone : 703-293-9624 Fax : 703-293-9609
e-mail :
http://www.on-the-i.com
Test your network for multicast : http://www.multicasttech.com/mt/
Check the status of multicast in real time :
http://www.multicasttech.com/status/index.html
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, (continued)
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, David Richardson, 06/11/2001
- Message not available
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Jan Novak, 06/11/2001
- Message not available
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Bill Nickless, 06/12/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Toerless Eckert, 06/12/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Bill Nickless, 06/12/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Toerless Eckert, 06/12/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Bill Nickless, 06/13/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Toerless Eckert, 06/13/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Bill Nickless, 06/12/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Toerless Eckert, 06/12/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Bill Nickless, 06/12/2001
- Message not available
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Jan Novak, 06/11/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Marshall Eubanks, 06/12/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Dino Farinacci, 06/12/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Nitin jain, 06/13/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Dino Farinacci, 06/12/2001
- Message not available
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Bill Nickless, 06/12/2001
- Re: Options for a multicast exchange point, Greg Shepherd, 06/12/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.