shibboleth-dev - Re: [Shib-Dev] OnDemand MetadataProvider
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Halm Reusser <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] OnDemand MetadataProvider
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:28:45 +0100
On 10.01.11 10:55, Patrik Schnellmann wrote:
New entities - i.e. a new entity of a VO, would propagate as needed.
However, changes of an entity already existing in metadata could not
be handled in a timely fashion with the "on demand" approach.
Full ack.
Despite of that I thought again of cost/benefit in our case. Tuning the
existent polling metadata provider (regarding Chad's hints) will be the
better approach.
Thanks for the discussion.
-Halm
- [Shib-Dev] OnDemand MetadataProvider, Halm Reusser, 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] OnDemand MetadataProvider, Chad La Joie, 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] OnDemand MetadataProvider, Lukas Hämmerle, 01/07/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] OnDemand MetadataProvider, Chad La Joie, 01/07/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] OnDemand MetadataProvider, Lukas Hämmerle, 01/07/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] OnDemand MetadataProvider, Patrik Schnellmann, 01/07/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] OnDemand MetadataProvider, Halm Reusser, 01/07/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] OnDemand MetadataProvider, Chad La Joie, 01/07/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] OnDemand MetadataProvider, Patrik Schnellmann, 01/10/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] OnDemand MetadataProvider, Lukas Hämmerle, 01/10/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] OnDemand MetadataProvider, Halm Reusser, 01/10/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] OnDemand MetadataProvider, Halm Reusser, 01/07/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] OnDemand MetadataProvider, Chad La Joie, 01/06/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.