Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: [Shib-Dev] Initial proposal on simplifying SP config

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: [Shib-Dev] Initial proposal on simplifying SP config


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Peter Schober <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] Initial proposal on simplifying SP config
  • Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 19:31:07 +0200
  • Organization: Vienna University Computer Center

* Jim Fox
<>
[2010-07-02 19:20]:
> Aside from the virtual host complexity you already mentioned, our
> mods are almost all the addition of session initiators. We generally
> use one or more of these:
>
> - direct to our IdP
> - to our IdP, but with isPassive
> - to our IdP, but with forceAuthn
> - to our IdP, but asking for the TimeSyncToken class ref
> - through a 1.3 wayf
> - through a discovery service (possibly)
>
> The parameters could probably be easily specified in your new file.

Or as request parameters to the standard initiator?

> Consider as a model that classic in non-xml simplicity: sendmail's
> config file.

I'm seriously missing some indication of a joke here.
A sentence with both "sendmail config" and "simplicity" neither a
negation operator nor a smiley is something you don't meet everyday.

> I like the semi-colon as comment. What's that from? Lisp?
The complete syntax (with sections etc) is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INI_file

cheers,
-peter



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page