shibboleth-dev - RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Peter Williams <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:35:17 -0700
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
Can you specifically disclose the Shibboleth communities rationales and
motivating use cases?
Presumably, there was a review at some point, with associated disclosure,
discussion ppts, comments, contributions, etc.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Cantor
> [mailto:]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 12:45 PM
> To:
>
> Subject: RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML
> 2.0 Profiles
>
>
> wrote on 2009-03-30:
> >
> > I have some questions about the SAML V2.0 Condition for Delegation
> > Restriction Version 1.0.
>
> Unless we're talking Shibboleth specific questions, please use the
> public
> SSTC comments address for this kind of feedback. I don't think it's a
> good
> idea to pursue it here.
>
> It's fine to ask questions there, people may or may not have feedback
> based
> on what the answers are.
>
> -- Scott
>
- FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/26/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Peter Williams, 03/26/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/26/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Peter Williams, 03/29/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/29/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Peter Williams, 03/29/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/26/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Peter Williams, 03/29/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/29/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Jeff.Krug, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Jeff.Krug, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Peter Williams, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Jeff.Krug, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Peter Williams, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Jeff.Krug, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Peter Williams, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Peter Williams, 03/26/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.