Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Peter Williams <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles
  • Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:23:28 -0700
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US

What is the "impending problem" - that didn't exist 3 years ago with
sufficient imperative?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Cantor
> [mailto:]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 1:48 PM
> To:
>
> Subject: RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML
> 2.0 Profiles
>
> Peter Williams wrote on 2009-03-30:
> > Can you specifically disclose the Shibboleth communities rationales
> and
> > motivating use cases?
>
> https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/ShibuPortal/Home
>
> > Presumably, there was a review at some point, with associated
> disclosure,
> > discussion ppts, comments, contributions, etc.
>
> I needed a solution to an impending problem, warned a few people left
> in
> Liberty where the work overlapped with prior art, and then I wrote it
> up.
>
> I am in a unique position to do so with respect to composition with the
> original standard because I know what the original standard was
> designed to
> do once the necessary extensions and profiling were done. The
> delegation
> work, apart from the portion already done in Liberty, is just the
> material I
> couldn't spend time on three years ago when I was writing the original
> spec.
>
> -- Scott
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page