Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Scott Cantor" <>
  • To: <>
  • Subject: RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles
  • Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:22:54 -0400
  • Organization: The Ohio State University
Peter Williams wrote on 2009-03-29:
> By design, are the handling rules in
> http://projectliberty.org/resource_center/specifications/igf_1_0_specs
> intended to cooperate with http://docs.oasis-
> open.org/security/saml/Post2.0/sstc-saml-attribute-ext-cd-01.pdf?

There's no overlap between the people working on IGF (which I haven't spent
any time looking at), and either myself, or the actual source of the
attribute extension use case itself, which was not me, but Microsoft.

-- Scott



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page