Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Peter Williams <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles
  • Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 06:58:44 -0700
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US

By design, are the handling rules in
http://projectliberty.org/resource_center/specifications/igf_1_0_specs
intended to cooperate with
http://docs.oasis-open.org/security/saml/Post2.0/sstc-saml-attribute-ext-cd-01.pdf?

Don't over-parse by choice of words.

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Scott Cantor
> [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:16 PM
> To:
>
> Subject: RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML
> 2.0 Profiles
>
> Peter Williams wrote on 2009-03-26:
> > Are there any academic papers that support the specifications with
> use
> case
> > analysis, research/analysis, limits/analysis, empirical evidence,
> etc?
>
> No.
>
> -- Scott
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page