shibboleth-dev - RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Peter Williams <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles
- Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 06:58:44 -0700
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
By design, are the handling rules in
http://projectliberty.org/resource_center/specifications/igf_1_0_specs
intended to cooperate with
http://docs.oasis-open.org/security/saml/Post2.0/sstc-saml-attribute-ext-cd-01.pdf?
Don't over-parse by choice of words.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Cantor
> [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:16 PM
> To:
>
> Subject: RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML
> 2.0 Profiles
>
> Peter Williams wrote on 2009-03-26:
> > Are there any academic papers that support the specifications with
> use
> case
> > analysis, research/analysis, limits/analysis, empirical evidence,
> etc?
>
> No.
>
> -- Scott
>
- FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/26/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Peter Williams, 03/26/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/26/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Peter Williams, 03/29/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/29/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Peter Williams, 03/29/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/26/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Peter Williams, 03/29/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/29/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Jeff.Krug, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Jeff.Krug, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Peter Williams, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Jeff.Krug, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Jeff.Krug, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Peter Williams, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Peter Williams, 03/26/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.