Shibboleth Developers

[Jim Fox <>]

My original intent was to make this UW specific as you suggest.    
Supporting the more generic method as well (in the more distant  
future, maybe) might make us a bit more federation friendly though.

Jim

On Dec 15, 2008, at 9:23 AM, RL 'Bob' Morgan wrote:

> > 2) SecureID:  pubcookie supports this also, with a distinct authn  
> > ur l
> > to trigger securid login.  Is this a proper use of  
> > authnContextClassRef
> > ?  If so, is there a way to communicate 'secureid' to the handler in
> > (1)?  or should I implement a separate login handler for this?
>
> I think we'd want to define a UW-specific authnContext for this  
> purpose
> since it's really a UW-specific method, especially since we now have  
> a mix
> of SecurID and OATH tokens.  I suppose if there were support already  
> in
> SPs for a vaguely applicable SAML-spec-defined authnContext (eg
> TimeSyncToken) such that that method could be configured easily then  
> we
> could just use that and ignore the discrepancy.  I don't know what  
> support
> there is in the Shib SP (or other SPs) for configuring contexts or  
> adding
> new ones though.
>
>  - RL "Bob"