Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: Shibboleth and WebLogic Server

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: Shibboleth and WebLogic Server


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Tom Scavo" <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: Shibboleth and WebLogic Server
  • Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:59:18 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Y2LK/IBQTA3qv5Ms4MXs06VXZQz849gLnTZIS5+LvL35CZNMWYkQHZcNjUxBknjYm8ViVBywrqQ5ZLF9BxpzDtqy9e8Mym1ZLzoXUYRAzgds5r9V0uUwbsOkgxi9+1PTm5n1vQiNTUDP3C9nfjCAsK2w3gEOcXGM3T3NmmhES7c=
On 5/30/07, Brett Lomas
<>
wrote:

I thought
(and I am likely to be wrong here) that the SAML specification was for
the target parameter to be in all uppercase going into and out of the
ITS (according to the SAML 1.1 Bindings and Profiles on page 20),
although it does say recommended though.

Well, the SAML V1.1 spec doesn't say anything about a "target"
parameter in an authn request since SAML V1.1 doesn't specify an authn
request. The latter is an invention of Shibboleth, and for better or
worse, it's 'target' going in and 'TARGET' coming out.

It is also part of the spec that the ACS must use the issuer in the
assertion?

I'm not following you here...use issuer for what?

Cheers,
Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page