shibboleth-dev - RE: Form of ADFS code integration in 2.0 SP
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: Form of ADFS code integration in 2.0 SP
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:24:52 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> I guess what I'm saying is: don't make it harder to change an existing
> installation to enable the extension, but anything else doesn't really
> matter.
It wouldn't be any worse than now, certainly, the difference is whether
there's a Library element required in the Extensions section or not.
Since I don't see much demand for it now or in the future (SAML 2.0 is miles
beyond what passive WS-Federation can do), I think I'll leave it separate.
-- Scott
- Form of ADFS code integration in 2.0 SP, Scott Cantor, 04/03/2007
- Re: Form of ADFS code integration in 2.0 SP, Simon McLeish, 04/04/2007
- RE: Form of ADFS code integration in 2.0 SP, Scott Cantor, 04/04/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Form of ADFS code integration in 2.0 SP, Scott Cantor, 04/03/2007
- Re: Form of ADFS code integration in 2.0 SP, Simon McLeish, 04/04/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.