shibboleth-dev - Re: passive authN
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Chad La Joie <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: passive authN
- Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 14:35:00 -0500
- Organization: UIS - Project Sentinel
It's possible. My impression, from talking to people, is that more schools auth directly against their authentication store than use a local SSO system. Either way, still works the same.
Jim Fox wrote:
Okay, I think I've collected all the information I posted here onto the wiki. It doesn't have class diagrams and sequence diagrams yet, but hopefully those will follow.
https://authdev.it.ohio-state.edu/twiki/bin/view/Shibboleth/ShibTwoAuthN
--
From the web page:
"Exactly what the Authentication Handler does... The most common case,
currently, will probably be to show a log in form, ...
I would think the most common case would be that the handler
is protected by the local sso system, pubcookie, cas, ..., and
that the handler just records the necessary information.
Jim
--
Chad La Joie 315Q St. Mary's Hall
Project Sentinel 202.687.0124
- Re: passive authN, Chad La Joie, 11/02/2005
- Re: passive authN, Jim Fox, 11/02/2005
- Re: passive authN, Chad La Joie, 11/02/2005
- RE: passive authN, Scott Cantor, 11/02/2005
- Re: passive authN, Tom Barton, 11/02/2005
- RE: passive authN, Scott Cantor, 11/02/2005
- Re: passive authN, Tom Barton, 11/02/2005
- RE: passive authN, Scott Cantor, 11/02/2005
- RE: passive authN, Jim Fox, 11/02/2005
- Re: passive authN, Scott Cantor, 11/02/2005
- RE: passive authN, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/03/2005
- Re: passive authN, Tom Scavo, 11/03/2005
- Re: passive authN, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/03/2005
- RE: passive authN, Scott Cantor, 11/02/2005
- Re: passive authN, Tom Barton, 11/02/2005
- RE: passive authN, Scott Cantor, 11/02/2005
- Re: passive authN, Tom Barton, 11/02/2005
- Re: passive authN, Jim Fox, 11/02/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.