Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-10

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-10


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Scott Cantor <>
  • Cc: Shibboleth Development <>
  • Subject: Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-10
  • Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:00:32 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sSBEJqEUlR07O6FKBNx3YQs4wassAgYb6VJD+7/dxoikcx4YcVxFF/t9OmSBrx0TNbKY0XnLo388JzYWtfbLO7MESURx7xoI4XniU9Nz8oZ9SeQse8rRq6LwddgnZer9LRGmrdK5gAlXzUOFHs73QVXrOJiJI3vHY0VZsUmeruw=
On 9/10/05, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
> As a possible compromise, how about this language:
>
> "A Shibboleth identity provider MUST include the <md:IDPSSODescriptor>
> element in a metadata instance that is produced for consumption by a
> Shibboleth service provider."
>
> (Likewise in the other cases.)
>
> Is that any better?

Yes, that's much improved. Thanks for working this through with me.
I feel much better about it. :-)

Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page