shibboleth-dev - RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-10
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>, "'Shibboleth Development'" <>
- Subject: RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-10
- Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 00:01:41 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
As a possible compromise, how about this language:
"A Shibboleth identity provider MUST include the <md:IDPSSODescriptor>
element in a metadata instance that is produced for consumption by a
Shibboleth service provider."
(Likewise in the other cases.)
Is that any better?
I'll see if there is clarity in section 2 in defining these terms.
-- Scott
- comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-conformance-05, Tom Scavo, 09/09/2005
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-10, Scott Cantor, 09/10/2005
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-10, Tom Scavo, 09/10/2005
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-conformance-05, Scott Cantor, 09/10/2005
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-conformance-05, Tom Scavo, 09/10/2005
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-conformance-05, Scott Cantor, 09/10/2005
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-conformance-05, Tom Scavo, 09/10/2005
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-10, Scott Cantor, 09/10/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.