shibboleth-dev - Re: extension unit testing

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: extension unit testing

From: Chad La Joie <>
To:
Subject: Re: extension unit testing
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:56:04 -0400
Organization: UIS - Project Sentinel

That is correct. Also, something to note, the unit tests run BEFORE the macro replacement in config files as this is part of the installation process.

Tom Scavo wrote:

The bug that started this thread has been fixed but I wanted to ask a
question, mostly as a sanity check. The extension unit test framework
is meant to test a pre-install config, right? In other words, the
unit tests should not assume a successful installation since the unit
tests are run before the extension is actually installed. Is this
correct?

Tom

--
Chad La Joie 315Q St. Mary's Hall
Project Sentinel 202.687.0124

Re: extension unit testing, (continued)
- Re: extension unit testing, Chad La Joie, 08/22/2005
  - Re: extension unit testing, Tom Scavo, 08/22/2005
    - Re: extension unit testing, Chad La Joie, 08/22/2005
      - Re: extension unit testing, Tom Scavo, 08/22/2005
        
        Re: extension unit testing, Tom Scavo, 08/22/2005
        
        Re: extension unit testing, Chad La Joie, 08/22/2005
        
        Re: extension unit testing, Tom Scavo, 08/26/2005
        Re: extension unit testing, Chad La Joie, 08/26/2005
        Re: extension unit testing, Tom Scavo, 08/26/2005
        Re: extension unit testing, Walter Hoehn, 08/26/2005
        Re: extension unit testing, Tom Scavo, 08/26/2005
        Re: extension unit testing, Chad La Joie, 08/26/2005
        Re: extension unit testing, Tom Scavo, 08/26/2005
        Re: extension unit testing, Chad La Joie, 08/26/2005
        Re: extension unit testing, Tom Scavo, 08/26/2005
        Re: extension unit testing, Tom Scavo, 08/28/2005
        Re: extension unit testing, Chad La Joie, 08/29/2005
        Re: extension unit testing, Chad La Joie, 08/29/2005

List archive

Re: extension unit testing