Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: extension unit testing

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: extension unit testing


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: extension unit testing
  • Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:50:34 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ENQYCF6YrN1BmP7eywHU1sUii8aSo9xuHoLEuYqH/ceP5zTOS7lZVm+ophbw/4J+f7ffGHM7xvwTBSchipUx+WEkETZznNAGWAqME+LlylDLIBFMt+gA1fEaUmAkV6fwOuJTRtmHC44hZxMH4UkIaX933dhbNE+Ba8wwLsXlWjg=
The bug that started this thread has been fixed but I wanted to ask a
question, mostly as a sanity check. The extension unit test framework
is meant to test a pre-install config, right? In other words, the
unit tests should not assume a successful installation since the unit
tests are run before the extension is actually installed. Is this
correct?

Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page