Shibboleth Developers

[Chad La Joie <>]

Tom Scavo wrote:
> > JARs with IdP code and extension code do not appear on
> > the classpath.
>
>
> We're getting there, but not quite :-)  It looks like extension JARs
> are on the head of the test path in build.xml.

Yep, I remember discussing this one with Walter.  He felt they should be 
there in the case where an IdP test case tests something that relies on 
an item in an extension (e.g. testing the attribute resolver might 
require extensions that contain new data connectors).  Which makes 
sense.  Also, in this case, there is only the extension JARs, not the 
unpacked extension classes, on the classpath (the extension classes are 
only used by the extension unit test, prior to extension JAR creation). 
 If your unit test behaves oddly here I think it's likely your WAR will 
behave oddly as the JARs that are used for the test are the ones that go 
in to the WAR.

So, just to make sure I understand.  Are you running an IdP unit test 
which is invoking some code in your extension when you see the behavior 
of it picking up old class files?
--
Chad La Joie             315Q St. Mary's Hall
Project Sentinel         202.687.0124