Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: Integration JUnit testing

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: Integration JUnit testing


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Will Norris <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: Integration JUnit testing
  • Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 09:54:09 -0500


On Aug 22, 2005, at 2:16 PM, Howard Gilbert wrote:
JUnit testing of the Shibboleth SP can be difficult because of several things:

<snip>


When I started working with Walter, one of the first projects he had me do was to create a mechanism to do blackbox unit testing on the IdP code. After looking at Cactus and Mock Objects, I ended up going with an Embedded Tomcat instance with a custom protocol handler. This custom handler bypasses sockets altogether and instead publicizes the process() method so that fabricated HTTP requests can be injected directly into the servlet for processing. It was working great in 1.2.1, but I didn't have time to verify it against 1.3 so it was never committed to CVS. Since this type of blackbox testing is obviously being done on both the IdP and SP side, perhaps we should attempt to standardize our methods some way. thoughts?

-will


--
Will Norris
Information Technology
The University of Memphis


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page