shibboleth-dev - Re: EAuth subjectname
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "RL 'Bob' Morgan" <>
- To: Nathan Dors <>
- Cc: Shibboleth Dev Team <>
- Subject: Re: EAuth subjectname
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Nathan Dors wrote:
Does the E-Auth federation say anything about what should be stuck in there?
The "SAMLspec.pdf" doc (from http://cio.gov/eauthentication/TechSuite.htm) just says it's an "end user identifier (Uid) such that no two subscribers within a CS can share the same uid." The folks at NSF Fastlane say that an opaque value is fine, ie they wouldn't ever show it to the user. And obviously a value that is more stable over time (eg targetedid or uuid) is better than one that is less stable (eg typical netid).
- RL "Bob"
- EAuth subjectname, Jim Fox, 06/21/2005
- Re: EAuth subjectname, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 06/21/2005
- Re: EAuth subjectname, Nathan Dors, 06/21/2005
- Re: EAuth subjectname, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 06/21/2005
- RE: EAuth subjectname, Scott Cantor, 06/21/2005
- RE: EAuth subjectname, Jim Fox, 06/22/2005
- RE: EAuth subjectname, Scott Cantor, 06/22/2005
- RE: EAuth subjectname, Jim Fox, 06/22/2005
- RE: EAuth subjectname, Scott Cantor, 06/22/2005
- RE: EAuth subjectname, David L. Wasley, 06/22/2005
- RE: EAuth subjectname, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 06/22/2005
- RE: EAuth subjectname, Jim Fox, 06/22/2005
- RE: EAuth subjectname, Scott Cantor, 06/22/2005
- RE: EAuth subjectname, Jim Fox, 06/22/2005
- RE: EAuth subjectname, Scott Cantor, 06/22/2005
- RE: EAuth subjectname, Jim Fox, 06/22/2005
- Re: EAuth subjectname, Nathan Dors, 06/21/2005
- Re: EAuth subjectname, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 06/21/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.