shibboleth-dev - Re: SAML implementations besides Shib
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Tom Scavo <>
- To: Alistair Young <>
- Cc: Scott Cantor <>, Shibboleth Development <>
- Subject: Re: SAML implementations besides Shib
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:44:25 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=s5OZ1o6VGgUnlFBa6/VxuO0+cVBnnLgPOv2iVzEjlYPzCA4LD86dyAtX7GkzAFLaahPZBNcuV1pry5OB4eMbfDjhEn9hVOr1L96eYkpu9ccxG/C4zhfRE2IPNF12KPJlx7tXS/DD1ZKARhf5eCfjp/CaIfC+UFnhxXA70Mv7iEg=
On 4/27/05, Alistair Young
<>
wrote:
> Do you mean all the SAML1.1 browser profiles Tom? Browser/POST,
> Artifact etc?
Yes, both Browser/POST and Browser/Artifact (so only Shib 1.3 qualifies).
> Is it likely that a single application would support all possible SAML
> profiles?
There are only two SAML 1.1 profiles (above), so the requirements are
not too steep. Of course SAML2 is another question altogether.
> The JISC funded Guanxi project:
> http://www.jisc.ac.uk/index.cfm?name=project_guanxi
> http://www.guanxi.uhi.ac.uk
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/guanxi/
>
> is an open source implementation of the SAML1.1 Shibboleth profile,
> i.e. it's a Shibboleth compatible IdP and SP.
Is Guanxi a deployment of Shibboleth or an implementation of
Shibboleth? (An implementation would be reinventing the wheel.)
> SAMUEL (SAMl Used in E Learning) is an open source partial
> imlementation of the SAML1.1 spec. It's a toolkit for building SAML
> packets. It's part of the Guanxi project.
Can you give a reference? How does SAMUEL differ from OpenSAML?
> Currently Guanxi is an IdP with the SP part due out in the next few
> months.
>
> The open source Bodington VLE has an embedded Guanxi IdP, giving it
> Shibboleth compatibility out of the box:
> http://bodington.org/
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/bodington
More deployments?
Thanks for the pointers, Alistair. I appreciate it.
Tom
- SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/26/2005
- RE: SAML implementations besides Shib, Scott Cantor, 04/26/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/26/2005
- RE: SAML implementations besides Shib, Scott Cantor, 04/26/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/26/2005
- RE: SAML implementations besides Shib, Scott Cantor, 04/26/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/26/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Alistair Young, 04/27/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/27/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Alistair Young, 04/27/2005
- RE: SAML implementations besides Shib, Scott Cantor, 04/27/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Sean Mehan, 04/27/2005
- RE: SAML implementations besides Shib, Scott Cantor, 04/27/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/27/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Alistair Young, 04/27/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/26/2005
- RE: SAML implementations besides Shib, Scott Cantor, 04/26/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/26/2005
- RE: SAML implementations besides Shib, Scott Cantor, 04/26/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/26/2005
- RE: SAML implementations besides Shib, Scott Cantor, 04/26/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/27/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 04/27/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.