shibboleth-dev - SAML implementations besides Shib
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Tom Scavo <>
- To: Shibboleth Development <>
- Subject: SAML implementations besides Shib
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:57:43 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=DivLdKAN/pccRqWF7jtvCAHgU8pdEibwtCSZC+x3+KCvvFPp36spy+DZajCm0CQJsPBPgzRu/tgKXuwU066YLeyupCOndGk1wvQewoUtX6YJGW9v5b4hn9RHcj1i2FQZHniiiIJZwuouh9AmEcZ6A2VzfIU+8Sk4e75KLPfaZqs=
I'm writing some introductory slides on SAML. Is it safe to say that
Shibboleth is the only open source implementation of the SAML 1.1
browser profiles? I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on this
question.
Thanks,
Tom
- SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/26/2005
- RE: SAML implementations besides Shib, Scott Cantor, 04/26/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/26/2005
- RE: SAML implementations besides Shib, Scott Cantor, 04/26/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/26/2005
- RE: SAML implementations besides Shib, Scott Cantor, 04/26/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/26/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Alistair Young, 04/27/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/27/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Alistair Young, 04/27/2005
- RE: SAML implementations besides Shib, Scott Cantor, 04/27/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/26/2005
- RE: SAML implementations besides Shib, Scott Cantor, 04/26/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/26/2005
- RE: SAML implementations besides Shib, Scott Cantor, 04/26/2005
- Re: SAML implementations besides Shib, Tom Scavo, 04/26/2005
- RE: SAML implementations besides Shib, Scott Cantor, 04/26/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.