shibboleth-dev - RE: CryptoHandleGenerator
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: "'Tom Scavo'" <>
- Cc: "'Shibboleth Development'" <>
- Subject: RE: CryptoHandleGenerator
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:06:42 -0500
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> What about the other SAML formats (unspecified, emailAddress, and
> WindowsDomainQualifiedName)? Won't these have the same problem as
> X509SubjectName?
I guess they would if anybody was using them. I just agree with Walter,
there isn't any real difference between writing your own and chaining them
together, especially if you have to write one of the links in the chain
anyway.
The only one with any real code behind it is the crypto thing.
-- Scott
- Re: CryptoHandleGenerator, (continued)
- Re: CryptoHandleGenerator, Tom Scavo, 03/16/2005
- RE: CryptoHandleGenerator, Scott Cantor, 03/16/2005
- Re: CryptoHandleGenerator, Tom Scavo, 03/16/2005
- RE: CryptoHandleGenerator, Scott Cantor, 03/16/2005
- Re: CryptoHandleGenerator, Tom Scavo, 03/16/2005
- Re: CryptoHandleGenerator, Walter Hoehn, 03/17/2005
- Re: CryptoHandleGenerator, Tom Scavo, 03/17/2005
- RE: CryptoHandleGenerator, Scott Cantor, 03/17/2005
- Re: CryptoHandleGenerator, Tom Scavo, 03/17/2005
- Re: CryptoHandleGenerator, Walter Hoehn, 03/17/2005
- RE: CryptoHandleGenerator, Scott Cantor, 03/17/2005
- Re: CryptoHandleGenerator, Tom Scavo, 03/17/2005
- Re: CryptoHandleGenerator, Von Welch, 03/17/2005
- Re: CryptoHandleGenerator, Tom Scavo, 03/18/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.