Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: CryptoHandleGenerator

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: CryptoHandleGenerator


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Scott Cantor <>
  • Cc: Shibboleth Development <>
  • Subject: Re: CryptoHandleGenerator
  • Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:16:11 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=aDeuoBcj6FMuIVLCiwPvelALlCqT8JsnJnqe+cDgD5Sf8SmAFD7xIHBRC35In8s87K+58DI2xkv15Y+a0LPXyeMfO8/n12zJZn1ZAOoSlgXe5MZ7ijZZOgv6AXhYCaacdLU+ULRVq9mtNrtSB97quTEE+atfsNUA68uJL8BmSSU=

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:42:28 -0500, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
> > Will this work in Shib 1.3?
>
> It will work now. I think we're just talking past each other. The thing you
> can't do is map the same format URI to multiple plugins at the same time.
> But I don't see why that's needed here.

Suppose an existing IdP already has a mapping for the X509SubjectName
format. Now GridShib comes along and wants to map that format to its
plugin. From what I hear you saying, the two will not coexist.

So how does LionShare solve this problem? I'm guessing, but LionShare
probably uses the CryptoHandleGenerator mapping type. Does this mean
that the AA can not also support ordinary shib handles?

Tom



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page