Shibboleth Developers

["Scott Cantor" <>]

> If the NameMapper class invoked the two mappings in sequence
> (SharedMemoryShibHandle, then CryptoShibHandle), wouldn't that solve
> the problem?

Yeah, but why bother? Just use the crypto handle. I can't imagine anyone not
using it now. The shared memory thing is worthless for most production
sites.

Your X.509 case is the only likely example, and almost nobody uses them. So
it's a serious niche case.

-- Scott