Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: CryptoHandleGenerator

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: CryptoHandleGenerator


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Scott Cantor <>
  • Cc: Shibboleth Development <>
  • Subject: Re: CryptoHandleGenerator
  • Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:00:11 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=MDhq9X2idZNjJBWfnZmaeLuBh/jRGAduY3gpYsQZTrUeaoWcnqtyMSzhCv1xJKLu8OEwuggOa1EZHmZNgNAnkWahNW62rsiVgMmGUDecAwvRKTQQmtnk4CwgZ5nJrmBloh9okcay7ZC1HQ9f5+Z6yqeY4AUqGLRNQn/ZTQBx1+Y=

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:47:37 -0500, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
> > The current design (which I think Walter may be changing) is that the
> > Format attribute is used to find the right NameMapping element to
> > use, and then the type in that tells the HS what class to use to generate
> > the NameID.
>
> Sorry, meant to say that the AA uses the Format to figure out what class to
> use to recover the principal (i.e. if it's "shib-handle", then use the
> crypto thing).

Um, what is "shib-handle"?

> The HS is backwards from that, it determines what to use based on the
> relying party, and then the NameMapping it chooses based on that tells it
> how to generate the name but also what format to stick in.

Will metadata be used instead in 1.3?

Thanks,
Tom



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page