Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: shib version history

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: shib version history


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: RL 'Bob' Morgan <>
  • Cc: Shibboleth Development <>
  • Subject: Re: shib version history
  • Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:56:11 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=QbVgxKUHPlsCTXmsnpy/y8Dxv3No4L704uIR0vyt0e/bIUhW2Y2vYjHQ2Wyk0JLJLWhs0JJfKS0jfwO7V+K3mfplWGtGCajC5jKHc/9fy1FwrOTHOp6AfDIKpJtU5Aov26N9KesGNDGPp7ZRVS99Sh25qnnEZ8MVo6IZwQcHXl4=
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 09:59:19 -0800 (PST), RL 'Bob' Morgan
<>
wrote:
>
> Ironically enough SAML 1.0 support is being added to satisfy the
> US Federal E-Authentication program requirements.

Yes, I asked Peter Alterman @ NIH about that. One of the feds'
requirements is that there be at least two vendor implementations of
the technology. At the time, only SAML 1.0 satisfied that
requirement. In practice, it's not a big deal though, since SAML 1.0
and 1.1 are so similar.

Have you considered submitting Shib to the E-Auth Interop Lab? There
are only seven vendors on that list so it would be a big feather in
your cap (depending on your point of view :).

Cheers,
Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page