Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSonar and Raspberry Pi

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSonar and Raspberry Pi


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Matthew Woodward <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSonar and Raspberry Pi
  • Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:43:10 -0500
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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

Also, you'd be limited to a max of 480Mbps (although it would probably be less than that, say, ~300Mbps) since USB2 tops out at that speed.

- M

On 2/28/17 3:16 PM, Steven Wallace wrote:
I’m planning something similar. One issue that others have raised is that the
pi’s ethernet interface uses a USB controller, resulting in a fair amount of
jitter for delay testing.





On Nov 21, 2016, at 4:13 PM, Ryan Harden
<>
wrote:

Hello,

I’m digging up an old topic here, (yes I’ve read the archives) but I’m
curious what the current state of affairs is. The most recent conversations I
can find date back to 2014.

I’m working on building a low-cost perfSonar mesh to measure loss and latency
(throughput isn’t a requirement) across our campus. My goal is to build
something that can be deployed quickly and easily in either a permanent or
temporary fashion. Predictably, the RPi3 looks very attractive for this, so
I’ve acquired four to experiment with. I’m not looking for ns latency
resolution, just obvious spikes in latency that something like an RPi can
detect in a reliable way.

My goals are:
1) Power via PoE (done with adapter)
2) Run basic perfSonar packages (perhaps rebuilt for ARM?)
3) Gather wireless connection/auth statistics.
4) Run with zero local disk (PXE boot? NFS?) (Cycle PoE port triggers
software upgrade, etc)
5) Run periodic latency/loss tests. (think 30 second 1Mbps UDP tests, nothing
crazy)

Has anyone already worked on this? Any notes specifically for the RPi3? It’s
significantly faster and has some upgraded hardware over the original/RPi2
versions.
Given the relatively low investment so far, I could reset and go for a small
x86 device, but I’d prefer to stick with the RP if I can.

Thanks

/Ryan

Ryan Harden
Research and Advanced Networking Architect
University of Chicago - ASN160
P: 773.834.5441





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page