perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] BWCTL limits by tool
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: "Andrew Lake" <>
- To: "Murilo Vetter" <>
- Cc: "Szymon Trocha" <>,
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] BWCTL limits by tool
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 08:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Murilo,
Currently BWCTL does not have this type of limits. It makes sense why you would want to do that though, and I suspect it will become a more common request since the dual inetrface route is becoming more common and BWCTL supports more tools like ping/owping now. There is a big effort currently to write a new version of bwctl, BWCTL 2.0, and part of the motivation for that effort is to allow new types of limits in the future. Don’t take that as a promise that the initial version of BWCTL will have support for this exact limit day one, but it is something that has been talked about. A preview version of BWCTL 2.0 will be included with a new release candidate of the perfSONAR toolkit that should be available in about a week. It does not have support for this limit yet. I added your request to https://github.com/perfsonar/bwctl/issues/8 so we don’t forget about it as we work toward a final release, and I think it will be an important and useful feature in the future.
Thanks,
Andy
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Murilo Vetter <> wrote:
Hello,I asked this because I would like to guarantee that when is a OWAMP test, for instance, comes to interface A and IPERF3 test comes to interface B.I would like to ensure that owamp test doesn't comes to interface B. We would like to have a way to not conflict between distinct type of tests.How in older version bwctl just worked for IPERF, I just dedicated interface A for bwctl and interface B for ping/owamp/traceroute.We were doing it using linux vrf.Now, how bwctl interporates other tools, it doesn't isolate interfaces for each kind of test.This was the reason why I asked about limiting tests on limits.Any other suggestion how to do it?Hope I do myself explainable.Thanks in advance,--
<assinatura_pop.jpg>
Murilo Vetter
Analista REMEP-FLN/PoP-SC
PoP-SC - Ponto de Presença da RNP em Santa Catarina
REMEP-FLN - Rede Metropolitana de Educação e Pesquisa da Região de Florianópolis
RNP - Rede Nacional de Ensino e Pesquisa
UFSC - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
SETIC - Superintendência de Governança Eletrônica e Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação
Fundações de Apoio FEESC e FEPESE
--/--www.pop-sc.rnp.br
remep.pop-sc.rnp.br
CHAMADOS:
+55(48)3721-3000
INOC: 11242*100De: "Szymon Trocha" <>
Para: "Murilo Vetter" <>,
Enviadas: Segunda-feira, 29 de junho de 2015 7:56:48
Assunto: Re: [perfsonar-user] BWCTL limits by toolHi Murilo,
W dniu 2015-06-26 o 19:56, Murilo Vetter pisze:Hello,I am wondering if there is a way to configure BWCTL limits to limit bwctl to anwers to one specific interface to ping and to another specific interface to traceroute, for example.I was thinking that there would be a way to do it by bwctl limits.Do you know if that is possible?
Is this something you can't do with iptables?-- Szymon Trocha Poznań Supercomputing & Netw. Center ::: NETWORK OPERATION CENTER Tel. +48 618582022 ::: http://noc.man.poznan.pl
- [perfsonar-user] BWCTL limits by tool, Murilo Vetter, 06/26/2015
- [perfsonar-user] RE: BWCTL limits by tool, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 06/29/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] BWCTL limits by tool, Szymon Trocha, 06/29/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] BWCTL limits by tool, Murilo Vetter, 06/29/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] BWCTL limits by tool, Hyojoon Kim, 06/29/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] BWCTL limits by tool, Andrew Lake, 06/29/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] BWCTL limits by tool, Murilo Vetter, 06/29/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.