Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] BWCTL limits by tool

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] BWCTL limits by tool


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Andrew Lake" <>
  • To: "Murilo Vetter" <>
  • Cc: "Szymon Trocha" <>,
  • Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] BWCTL limits by tool
  • Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 08:07:03 -0700 (PDT)

Hi Murilo,

Currently BWCTL does not have this type of limits. It makes sense why you would want to do that though, and I suspect it will become a more common request since the dual inetrface route is becoming more common and BWCTL supports more tools like ping/owping now. There is a big effort currently to write a new version of bwctl, BWCTL 2.0, and part of the motivation for that effort is to allow new types of limits in the future. Don’t take that as a promise that the initial version of BWCTL will have support for this exact limit day one, but it is something that has been talked about. A preview version of BWCTL 2.0 will  be included with a new release candidate of the perfSONAR toolkit that should be available in about a week. It does not have support for this limit yet. I added your request to https://github.com/perfsonar/bwctl/issues/8 so we don’t forget about it as we work toward a final release, and I think it will be an important and useful feature in the future. 

Thanks,
Andy




On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Murilo Vetter <> wrote:

Hello,

I asked this because I would like to guarantee that when is a OWAMP test, for instance, comes to interface A and IPERF3 test comes to interface B.
I would like to ensure that owamp test doesn't comes to interface B. We would like to have a way to not conflict between distinct type of tests.

How in older version bwctl just worked for IPERF, I just dedicated interface A for bwctl and interface B for ping/owamp/traceroute.
We were doing it using linux vrf.

Now, how bwctl interporates other tools, it doesn't isolate interfaces for each kind of test.
This was the reason why I asked about limiting tests on limits.

Any other suggestion how to do it?

Hope I do myself explainable.

Thanks in advance,

--

<assinatura_pop.jpg>


Murilo Vetter
Analista REMEP-FLN/PoP-SC
PoP-SC - Ponto de Presença da RNP em Santa Catarina
REMEP-FLN - Rede Metropolitana de Educação e Pesquisa da Região de Florianópolis
RNP - Rede Nacional de Ensino e Pesquisa
UFSC - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
SETIC - Superintendência de Governança Eletrônica e Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação
Fundações de Apoio FEESC e FEPESE
--/--

www.pop-sc.rnp.br
remep.pop-sc.rnp.br
CHAMADOS:

+55(48)3721-3000
INOC: 11242*100



De: "Szymon Trocha" <>
Para: "Murilo Vetter" <>,
Enviadas: Segunda-feira, 29 de junho de 2015 7:56:48
Assunto: Re: [perfsonar-user] BWCTL limits by tool

Hi Murilo,

W dniu 2015-06-26 o 19:56, Murilo Vetter pisze:
Hello,

I am wondering if there is a way to configure BWCTL limits to limit bwctl to anwers to one specific interface to ping and to another specific interface to traceroute, for example.
I was thinking that there would be a way to do it by bwctl limits.
Do you know if that is possible?

Is this something you can't do with iptables?

-- 
Szymon Trocha

Poznań Supercomputing & Netw. Center ::: NETWORK OPERATION CENTER
Tel. +48 618582022 ::: http://noc.man.poznan.pl





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page