perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

["Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE)" <>]

Hey Murilo,

 

I am unsure why you are looking for this option in the bwctl.limits file. I believe it would be more appropriate to have this configuration option in the bwctld.conf. Anyway I believe it is not possible to separate the tests on different interfaces. I can’t see the connection between your inquiry and the issue you quote below. There is an another open issue https://github.com/perfsonar/bwctl/issues/12 which is being considered and is somewhat more related to your inquiry.

Could you still please explain the reasoning behind your interest? To me it seems very important to know what exactly is the route/path for the throughput test. The interference of traceroute probes is so much low to the throughput measurement, that I am wondering what would be the gain from this?

 

Best regards,

Ivan

 

 

 

 

From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Murilo Vetter
Sent: Freitag, 26. Juni 2015 19:56
To:
Subject: [perfsonar-user] BWCTL limits by tool

 

Hello,

 

I am wondering if there is a way to configure BWCTL limits to limit bwctl to anwers to one specific interface to ping and to another specific interface to traceroute, for example.

I was thinking that there would be a way to do it by bwctl limits.

Do you know if that is possible?

 

I saw something similar in this ticket [https://code.google.com/p/perfsonar-ps/issues/detail?id=943], but it is still open. Is it already implemented?

 

Thanks,

--

 

Murilo Vetter
Analista REMEP-FLN/PoP-SC
PoP-SC - Ponto de Presença da RNP em Santa Catarina
REMEP-FLN - Rede Metropolitana de Educação e Pesquisa da Região de Florianópolis
RNP - Rede Nacional de Ensino e Pesquisa
UFSC - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
SETIC - Superintendência de Governança Eletrônica e Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação
Fundações de Apoio FEESC e FEPESE
--/--

www.pop-sc.rnp.br
remep.pop-sc.rnp.br
CHAMADOS:
+55(48)3721-3000
INOC: 11242*100