perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Brian Candler <>
- To: Eli Dart <>
- Cc: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources
- Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 19:20:42 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=message-id:date :from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=B/bDR2NX5YYm41iOK8z9oghKLx+86asb IRuv3To44T6qQ9h4q2Mmmh5a9j/QX8acOMXqMazJCTJTZijVj6bdjIASWo71P8IE 2xxgm8s22VWq4DzAtVyIrvvT3Q5TS1/IBJXYLKctUEgrDWqu24+yPxufN4r1nzJ3 txDvTsVyPjY=
On 05/12/2014 18:32, Eli Dart wrote:
Because the round-trip latency measurement doesn't depend on clock skew. Yes, it's short distances - right now it's in the office for test, and when deployed it will be over a few hops of fibre. However I've just discovered that the office ISP appears to be blocking NTP responses - probably a misguided attempt to protect against NTP DoS attacks - so maybe NTP should be able to achieve better than I have been seeing once the boxes go into the field. I'll also try to give the ISP some clue. Regards, Brian. |
- [perfsonar-user] NTP sources, Brian Candler, 12/05/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources, Eli Dart, 12/05/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources, Brian Candler, 12/05/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources, Alan Whinery, 12/05/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources, Jason Zurawski, 12/05/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources, Brian Candler, 12/05/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources, Jason Zurawski, 12/05/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources, Eli Dart, 12/05/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.