perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Eli Dart <>
- To: Brian Candler <>
- Cc: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 10:32:54 -0800
Hi Brian,
Just out of curiosity, why would you trust ping to measure latency if you're not satisfied with OWAMP?
If NTP clock skew is causing you problems, I'm guessing you're measuring latency over very short distances, but I'd like to ask before I assume. What sort of network are you trying to measure? I apologize if I've missed it in earlier threads.
Eli
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Brian Candler <> wrote:
I'm finding that the latencies I'm trying to measure are less than the differences in NTP-synced time, and this leads to very misleading graphs.
1. Does anyone have any suggestions for a good, but not-too-expensive, GPS time source to use with perfsonar/CentOS?
2. Is it possible to configure perfsonar to graph the sensitive packet loss from owamp, but hide the latency? (I can always use ping for round-trip latency)
Thanks,
Brian.
Eli Dart, Network Engineer NOC: (510) 486-7600
ESnet Office of the CTO (AS293) (800) 333-7638
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
PGP Key fingerprint = C970 F8D3 CFDD 8FFF 5486 343A 2D31 4478 5F82 B2B3
- [perfsonar-user] NTP sources, Brian Candler, 12/05/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources, Eli Dart, 12/05/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources, Brian Candler, 12/05/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources, Alan Whinery, 12/05/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources, Jason Zurawski, 12/05/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources, Brian Candler, 12/05/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources, Jason Zurawski, 12/05/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] NTP sources, Eli Dart, 12/05/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.