Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSONAR on multiple vlan interfaces per host

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSONAR on multiple vlan interfaces per host


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Ben Nelson <>
  • To: Andrew Lake <>,
  • Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSONAR on multiple vlan interfaces per host
  • Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:57:28 -0500

Thanks Andy, I'll check this out.

-Ben

On 1/14/14, 9:14 AM, Andrew Lake wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Unfortunately the toolkit doesn't directly support multiple interfaces at
> the moment. It only looks at one address for the host. The FAQ here has
> some more details and a link to a page that describes a way to use multiple
> interfaces involving some special wrapper scripts for bwctl and owamp that
> may help: http://psps.perfsonar.net/toolkit/FAQs.html#Q59
>
> The configuration is a bit involved and we are looking at better ways to do
> this in the future, but currently the above method has yielded some success
> for people wishing to do similar things.
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
>
> On Jan 13, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Ben Nelson
> <>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We're looking to setup a perfsonar mesh across multiple vlan interfaces
>> on a single host. Our network is setup such that we have multiple vlans
>> coming in to a single interface, which get transported across different
>> circuits when going out of our switch. Is a setup like this possible?
>>
>> I've tried adding multiple HOST fields with the same hostname, but
>> bwmaster only seems to pick up a single interface (typically the last in
>> the owmesh). Trying to use an interface IP in the HOST field results in
>> the bwmaster not seeing any tests to perform on the host. I've also
>> tried adding multiple NODE fields to a single hostname, which is how
>> I've been defining each interface, but a similar issue happens where
>> only the last NODE definition gets picked up by bwmaster.
>>
>> Can anyone verify if the HOST field does a DNS lookup to resolve to the
>> local machine, or does it match simply 'uname -a'?
>>
>> I have originally set it up such that each vlan (2 endpoints) is an
>> individual mesh, as it is easier to generate our configuration in this
>> manner. If there is a better way to do this, or a way in which this
>> will actually work, I would appreciate the advice.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ben
>>
>> --
>> Ben Nelson, Systems Engineer
>> Indiana University GlobalNOC
>> <>
>>

--
Ben Nelson, Systems Engineer
Indiana University GlobalNOC
<>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page