Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSONAR on multiple vlan interfaces per host

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSONAR on multiple vlan interfaces per host


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Andrew Lake <>
  • To: Ben Nelson <>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSONAR on multiple vlan interfaces per host
  • Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:14:03 -0500

Hi Ben,

Unfortunately the toolkit doesn't directly support multiple interfaces at the
moment. It only looks at one address for the host. The FAQ here has some more
details and a link to a page that describes a way to use multiple interfaces
involving some special wrapper scripts for bwctl and owamp that may help:
http://psps.perfsonar.net/toolkit/FAQs.html#Q59

The configuration is a bit involved and we are looking at better ways to do
this in the future, but currently the above method has yielded some success
for people wishing to do similar things.

Thanks,
Andy

On Jan 13, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Ben Nelson
<>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We're looking to setup a perfsonar mesh across multiple vlan interfaces
> on a single host. Our network is setup such that we have multiple vlans
> coming in to a single interface, which get transported across different
> circuits when going out of our switch. Is a setup like this possible?
>
> I've tried adding multiple HOST fields with the same hostname, but
> bwmaster only seems to pick up a single interface (typically the last in
> the owmesh). Trying to use an interface IP in the HOST field results in
> the bwmaster not seeing any tests to perform on the host. I've also
> tried adding multiple NODE fields to a single hostname, which is how
> I've been defining each interface, but a similar issue happens where
> only the last NODE definition gets picked up by bwmaster.
>
> Can anyone verify if the HOST field does a DNS lookup to resolve to the
> local machine, or does it match simply 'uname -a'?
>
> I have originally set it up such that each vlan (2 endpoints) is an
> individual mesh, as it is easier to generate our configuration in this
> manner. If there is a better way to do this, or a way in which this
> will actually work, I would appreciate the advice.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> --
> Ben Nelson, Systems Engineer
> Indiana University GlobalNOC
> <>
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page