Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-dev - Re: [PS-relmgmt] Re: [pS-dev] Tomcat/Services default port number for the release 3.1

Subject: perfsonar development work

List archive

Re: [PS-relmgmt] Re: [pS-dev] Tomcat/Services default port number for the release 3.1


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Roman Lapacz <>
  • To: Verena Venus <>
  • Cc: "" <>,
  • Subject: Re: [PS-relmgmt] Re: [pS-dev] Tomcat/Services default port number for the release 3.1
  • Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:36:36 +0200

Verena Venus wrote:
Hi,

according to this survey (http://news.softpedia.com/news/Ubuntu-and-Red-Hat-are-Top-Open-Source-Vendors-78441.shtml), Red Hat has a share of 35%, Ubuntu has 23%. So I would dare to say, that more people are using Red Hat than Ubuntu. This may change in the future, but I would not speculate that RPM-based is less used than debian-based or vice

this was only my personal opinion based on my observation that popularity of RedHat or Fedora is decreasing and Ubuntu is growing very fast

thanks for your input

Roman


versa. Both is common and will probaly stay common for quite a while.

Just my 2 cents,
Verena

Am Montag, 28. Juli 2008 12:52:57 schrieb Roman Lapacz:
Hi guys,

So far we have been using the port number 8080 for default
service/tomcat installation. Apart from rpms, in the release 3.1 we want
to have deb packages of our services running with Tomcat which is
already present as deb package in Ubuntu. The problem is that default
port value for it is 8180 (in RedHat it is still 8080). The question is
which port do we want to support as default one for our services? I
guess there are much more people using Ubuntu than RedHat (or other
rpm-based distros) so 8180 might be more convenient but I understand
that we may want to keep 8080 as well-known solution.

What's your opinion? Which port do you prefer for 3.1?

Roman







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page