perfsonar development work

[Michael Michalis <>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
Nina Jeliazkova wrote:
> Hi Fausto,
>
> Having a look on the response, my best guess is valueunits
> *"errors/sec*" is causing the problem. PerfsonarUI understands so
> far "Eps" for input errors and "Dps" for output drops (these were
> suggested by some time ago on the list and used in current
> services) , "Bps", "bps" and "octets" for utilization.
>
> This brings us once again to the need to have standardized list of
> valid units.
>
> Best regards, Nina
>
Can the value units be passed as metadata, like the interface
information?The client can retrieve the value units from there and
each service deplorer can use whatever units he likes.


Michalis
>
> Fausto Vetter написа:
>> Hi Nina,
>>
>> I am trying to validate my RRDMA service I am implementing to
>> CACTISonar. I tryed to test it using the last version available
>> and I am not being successful. I tryed to compare the results I
>> sent and other services also do, and to me they look very
>> similar. But even this way I am not getting perfsonar-ui plotting
>> graphs correctly. Attached it goes 2 documents: a request and a
>> response message I observed. Why do you think it is going wrong
>> now? Do you have any idea? Is the response message not well
>> formed? Once I had done it and it worked fine (last schema
>> version and the version prior this last one of perfsonar-ui).
>>
>> If you wanna test it, perfsonar-ui line configuration is:
>>
>> Fausto,http://150.162.248.28:8081/soc/plugins/perfsonar/web/CACTISonar.php,http://schemas.perfsonar.net/2.0,,http://ggf.org/ns/nmwg/characteristic/utilization/2.0,http://ggf.org/ns/nmwg/characteristic/utilization/2.0
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks a lot.
>>
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFG8PqvoEWq51/Q/40RArpEAJ9beeCIJaNoBRhLpaa9hl+guAP0uQCdG9Xk
m7OremwvJqlfW0y3jprmLLE=
=3vll
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----