Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ntacpeering - Re: Viability of a P&R FTW

Subject: NTAC Peering Working Group

List archive

Re: Viability of a P&R FTW


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Ryan Nobrega <>
  • To: "Spears, Christopher M." <>
  • Cc: Matt Zekauskas <>, Michael H Lambert <>, "" <>
  • Subject: Re: Viability of a P&R FTW
  • Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:15:03 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: oar.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;

No changes to date that I am aware of but community engagement has been out
talking to campuses about Deepfield and they are generating some interest on
that side.

-Ryan

> On Aug 18, 2015, at 4:46 PM, Spears, Christopher M.
> <>
> wrote:
>
> Any change in the NDA? I know that held some people back.
>
>
>> On Aug 18, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Matthew J Zekauskas
>> <>
>> wrote:
>>
>> With respect to DeepField: We've had some personnel turnover that I think
>> has helped give the impression of fade, but it still is up and running.
>> My suspicion is that it has been more useful to universities than
>> aggregators. If you have feedback, I think it would be welcome. Feel
>> free to send to myself or to Ryan Nobrega (cc'd, not on this list
>> currently) or
>> .
>>
>> --Matt
>>
>>
>> On 8/18/15 1:57 PM, Michael H Lambert wrote:
>>>>> Internet2 Tools:
>>>>> - Router-proxy
>>>>> - SNAPP
>>>>> - Deepfield (w/NDA)
>>> Should Deepfield be on the list? My impression is that after great
>>> initial hoopla, it has at best faded into the background. Or is this
>>> feeling just caused by the lack of follow-up by Internet2 with the
>>> regionals?
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page