Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ntacpeering - Re: Viability of a P&R FTW

Subject: NTAC Peering Working Group

List archive

Re: Viability of a P&R FTW


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Matthew J Zekauskas <>
  • To: Michael H Lambert <>, "" <>
  • Cc: Ryan Nobrega <>
  • Subject: Re: Viability of a P&R FTW
  • Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:14:33 -0400
  • Authentication-results: internet2.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
With respect to DeepField: We've had some personnel turnover that I think has helped give the impression of fade, but it still is up and running. My suspicion is that it has been more useful to universities than aggregators. If you have feedback, I think it would be welcome. Feel free to send to myself or to Ryan Nobrega (cc'd, not on this list currently) or .

--Matt


On 8/18/15 1:57 PM, Michael H Lambert wrote:
>Internet2 Tools:
>- Router-proxy
>- SNAPP
>- Deepfield (w/NDA)
Should Deepfield be on the list? My impression is that after great initial
hoopla, it has at best faded into the background. Or is this feeling just
caused by the lack of follow-up by Internet2 with the regionals?



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page