Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ntacpeering - Re: Viability of a P&R FTW

Subject: NTAC Peering Working Group

List archive

Re: Viability of a P&R FTW


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Spears, Christopher M." <>
  • To: Matt Zekauskas <>
  • Cc: Michael H Lambert <>, "" <>, Ryan Nobrega <>
  • Subject: Re: Viability of a P&R FTW
  • Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 20:45:54 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=temperror (sender IP is 164.107.81.222) smtp.mailfrom=oar.net; internet2.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
Any change in the NDA? I know that held some people back.


On Aug 18, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Matthew J Zekauskas
<>
wrote:

> With respect to DeepField: We've had some personnel turnover that I think
> has helped give the impression of fade, but it still is up and running.
> My suspicion is that it has been more useful to universities than
> aggregators. If you have feedback, I think it would be welcome. Feel
> free to send to myself or to Ryan Nobrega (cc'd, not on this list
> currently) or
> .
>
> --Matt
>
>
> On 8/18/15 1:57 PM, Michael H Lambert wrote:
>>> >Internet2 Tools:
>>> >- Router-proxy
>>> >- SNAPP
>>> >- Deepfield (w/NDA)
>> Should Deepfield be on the list? My impression is that after great
>> initial hoopla, it has at best faded into the background. Or is this
>> feeling just caused by the lack of follow-up by Internet2 with the
>> regionals?
>>
>


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page