Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ntacpeering - Re: NET+ traffic on R&E routes document

Subject: NTAC Peering Working Group

List archive

Re: NET+ traffic on R&E routes document


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Darrell Newcomb <>
  • To: Michael H Lambert <>
  • Cc: Linda Roos <>, " Routing WG" <>, George Loftus <>
  • Subject: Re: NET+ traffic on R&E routes document
  • Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 05:24:38 -0800

On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:49 AM, Michael H Lambert wrote:

> On 18 Sep 2013, at 12:42, Linda Roos
> <>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear NTAC Routing and Peering Committee,
>> Attached, please find, a document on NET+ traffic on R&E routes. This
>> document has been reviewed by the Network Architecture, Operations and
>> Policy Program Advisory Group (NAOPpag). Should you have any questions or
>> comments on the document, please let me know. Thanks.
>
> It's been a while and I've seen no comments, so I will do so now. I have a
> couple of problems with this sentence:
>
> "While these service providers may transport some “non-research” traffic to
> members over the network, reaching the providers over commodity paths or
> TR-CPS paths which are provisioned like commodity paths will not achieve
> what the community wants with NET+."
>
> 1) Where are the data that support this claim about community expectations
> for network performance for Net+?
>
> 2) I view TR-CPS as being closer in performance to the R&E network than to
> the commodity Internet. If there is a prevailing view that TR-CPS has
> become too "commodity-like", then perhaps what is needed is a strategic
> review of the peer selection process, followed by a review of individual
> peers in that context.

For point of reference TR-CPS is not very commodity-like other than in how
the far-end networks might be described; much more R&E-like than
commodity-like in most ways of considering those monikers. Are there
counter-points? I'm sure there are, but none jump to mind that are
inherently attached and would be more


----------


Cash investment over many years might have many describe as approaching-zero,
but I'll describe as far less than the median amount of a single-connector's
single-year payments but over a longer period of time.

Rather than peer selection there are a number of other factors that pushing
toward more "commodity like" aspects/outcomes. I'll skip trying to give more
description around some of those, but can if desired.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page