Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

netsec-sig - RE: [Security-WG] I2 - Turning off NTP?

Subject: Internet2 Network Security SIG

List archive

RE: [Security-WG] I2 - Turning off NTP?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Anthony Brock" <>
  • To: <>, "'gcbrowni'" <>
  • Cc: <>
  • Subject: RE: [Security-WG] I2 - Turning off NTP?
  • Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 09:53:35 -0700
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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

We don't run Juniper (yet), but doesn't the following imply that an ACL can
be applied?

http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junose14.2/topics/reference/command-summary/ntp-access-group.html

Also, I am very concerned about local clock drift. While we do send logs to
an external collector, I've been involved in too many situations where the
logs failed to be sent (either due to high CPU load, loss of connectivity, or
some other weird event) to be comfortable without NTP on the individual
routers.

Tony


-----Original Message-----
From:


[mailto:]
On Behalf Of John Kristoff
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 9:07 AM
To: gcbrowni
<>
Cc:

Subject: Re: [Security-WG] I2 - Turning off NTP?

On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 13:59:47 +0000
gcbrowni
<>
wrote:

> I wonder if anyone would be interested in engaging in a though
> experiment with me on turning off NTP on the routers?

Might the question be more general, such as "what would the effect of not
having a synchronized clock on a router be?" Or do you care specifically
about NTP?

> 2) You loose the ability to easily correlate messages between routers
> if their clocks don’t match. I suspect this is mostly a non-issue
> since most(?) are sending logs to something like Splunk which can
> stamp the time for correlation purposes?

Won't some log collectors also keep the time stamp from the local system? So
the inconvenience may be more widespread.

If you want to do RPKI, having an accurate notion is going to be desirable.

You might also want good clocks for NetFlow/IPFIX collectors if you export
flows.

> Anyone have thoughts or observations on this?

It seems unlikely to cause any serious operational issues on most networks,
but I'm not convinced removing it is better than keeping it.
I think the inconvenience is going to add up quickly for most "serious"
operators.

> is NTP still relevant on routers and/or does it justify the risk of
> running it?

Perhaps enumerate the risks as well. Depending on the router for example, a
default, accessible NTP service:

* may unwittingly become a reflector/amplifier
* may enable an information leak
* may present a CPU/packet DoS condition
* may expose an unauthenticated path into the system

John




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page