OpenSAML user discussion

[Jonathan Tellier <>]

Hey,

Just a quick note that might be of interest. I've realized that my
PAOS related changes to opensaml cannot all be contained inside my
SP's code tree [1]. I am therefore now directly modifying the opensaml
library. My work, which is based on v.2.4.1, is hosted on
http://gitorious.org/java-opensaml-paos

Right now, I've implemented a PAOS encoder, decoder and paos:Request handling.

Jonathan

[1] http://git.springsource.org/~jtellier/spring-security/se-security-saml-ecp


On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Brent Putman 
<>
 wrote:
>
>
> On 12/1/10 7:42 PM, Tom Scavo wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Brent Putman 
>> <>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> One thing to note is that PAOS is not part of the SAML spec, it's part
>>> of the Liberty suite of specs.
>>
>> Hmm, PAOS *is* a SAML V2.0 binding so I must be missing something...
>>
>
>
> True, yes there is a PAOS binding specified in SAML 2.  However, it's
> really just an "extension" of the Liberty PAOS binding, and just scopes
> down some details and variability allowed by the parent Liberty one.
> Most or all the really important info defining the binding is in the
> Liberty spec.  And in particular, all the XML schema is defined in the
> Liberty spec and defined in a Liberty namespace, which is really what my
> comment was about.
>