mace-opensaml-users - Re: [OpenSAML] PAOS binding

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: [OpenSAML] PAOS binding

From: Tom Scavo <>
To:
Subject: Re: [OpenSAML] PAOS binding
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 18:42:38 -0600
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=pRtLoiE5BXES9Nh4T9CJA4N4M0HuIhHU6nxkIbWxo9eqSAZ9s0stMRTIjpHZtQnfuE PvtVxENT5b+UCx498IC5xP13+cXESnHkbJR6GycDj8qqdEOTmJF+Z3GxP6aW5FJ+cDw4 DZYE6/a6YhOHabM454bloNdDqV6QcJaX4pYos=

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Brent Putman
<>
wrote:
>
> One thing to note is that PAOS is not part of the SAML spec, it's part
> of the Liberty suite of specs.

Hmm, PAOS *is* a SAML V2.0 binding so I must be missing something...

Tom

Re: [OpenSAML] PAOS binding, Jonathan Tellier, 12/01/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] PAOS binding, Brent Putman, 12/01/2010
  - Re: [OpenSAML] PAOS binding, Jonathan Tellier, 12/01/2010
  - Re: [OpenSAML] PAOS binding, Tom Scavo, 12/01/2010
    - Re: [OpenSAML] PAOS binding, Brent Putman, 12/02/2010
      - Re: [OpenSAML] PAOS binding, Jonathan Tellier, 12/15/2010
        
        RE: [OpenSAML] PAOS binding, Cantor, Scott E., 12/15/2010
        
        Re: [OpenSAML] PAOS binding, Jonathan Tellier, 12/15/2010
        
        Re: [OpenSAML] PAOS binding, Cantor, Scott E., 12/15/2010
        Re: [OpenSAML] PAOS binding, Jonathan Tellier, 12/17/2010
        RE: [OpenSAML] PAOS binding, Cantor, Scott E., 12/17/2010
        Re: [OpenSAML] PAOS binding, Chad La Joie, 12/17/2010

List archive

Re: [OpenSAML] PAOS binding