mace-opensaml-users - RE: [OpenSAML] Sun JDK 6 built-in xml parser better?
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] Sun JDK 6 built-in xml parser better?
- Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 20:31:51 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
Jeff Brewer wrote on 2009-05-05:
> We're about to find out with a custom patched xml tooling library. And if
it
> passes unit tests would you consider committing a patch to xml tooling to
> suppress the message for JDK 6?
It's not my call, but I don't think I would personally advocate anything
change until Shibboleth was fully tested with it, with schema validation on
and off.
My guess is it won't work, so it will be a moot debate. It would be
fantastic to actually find out why it does't work. If I knew what the bugs
were, I would be more than willing to annoy the hell out of some Sun
contacts about it.
-- Scott
- Sun JDK 6 built-in xml parser better?, Jeff Brewer, 05/05/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] Sun JDK 6 built-in xml parser better?, Scott Cantor, 05/05/2009
- Re: [OpenSAML] Sun JDK 6 built-in xml parser better?, Jeff Brewer, 05/05/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] Sun JDK 6 built-in xml parser better?, Scott Cantor, 05/05/2009
- Re: [OpenSAML] Sun JDK 6 built-in xml parser better?, Jeff Brewer, 05/05/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] Sun JDK 6 built-in xml parser better?, Scott Cantor, 05/05/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.