mace-opensaml-users - RE: [OpenSAML] Sun JDK 6 built-in xml parser better?
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] Sun JDK 6 built-in xml parser better?
- Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 20:14:22 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
Jeff Brewer wrote on 2009-05-05:
> I know there were bad bugs in the JDK 5 built-in XML parser which forces
use
> of the endorsed Apache XML libraries when using OpenSAML. However, I was
> wondering if the JDK 6 XML parsers were new-enough and bug-free enough
that
> the xmltooling check for com.sun xml parsers could be relaxed to not
> complain if JDK 6 were detected. This would simplify deployment on
Glassfish
> where we are having trouble getting endorsed libs to work correctly.
Don't think anybody knows, so I guess it's up to somebody who cares enough
to find out.
-- Scott
- Sun JDK 6 built-in xml parser better?, Jeff Brewer, 05/05/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] Sun JDK 6 built-in xml parser better?, Scott Cantor, 05/05/2009
- Re: [OpenSAML] Sun JDK 6 built-in xml parser better?, Jeff Brewer, 05/05/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] Sun JDK 6 built-in xml parser better?, Scott Cantor, 05/05/2009
- Re: [OpenSAML] Sun JDK 6 built-in xml parser better?, Jeff Brewer, 05/05/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] Sun JDK 6 built-in xml parser better?, Scott Cantor, 05/05/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.