mace-opensaml-users - RE: [OpenSAML] Migrating to opensaml 2.2.0

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

RE: [OpenSAML] Migrating to opensaml 2.2.0

From: "Scott Cantor" <>
To: <>
Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] Migrating to opensaml 2.2.0
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:27:40 -0400
Organization: The Ohio State University

> 1. Shouldn't a public key be used instead of a private key?

I suspect setting the private key established both halves of the keypair.

> 2. Are assertions usually decrypted, even when https is used?

You mean encrypted. People do what they want.

-- Scott

Migrating to opensaml 2.2.0, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 10/21/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML] Migrating to opensaml 2.2.0, Brent Putman, 10/22/2008
  - RE: [OpenSAML] Migrating to opensaml 2.2.0, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 10/23/2008
    - RE: [OpenSAML] Migrating to opensaml 2.2.0, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 10/24/2008
      - RE: [OpenSAML] Migrating to opensaml 2.2.0, Scott Cantor, 10/24/2008
        
        RE: [OpenSAML] Migrating to opensaml 2.2.0, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 10/27/2008
        
        RE: [OpenSAML] Migrating to opensaml 2.2.0, Scott Cantor, 10/27/2008
        
        RE: [OpenSAML] Migrating to opensaml 2.2.0, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 10/27/2008
        RE: [OpenSAML] Migrating to opensaml 2.2.0, Scott Cantor, 10/27/2008
        
        Re: [OpenSAML] Migrating to opensaml 2.2.0, Brent Putman, 10/27/2008
        
        Re: [OpenSAML] Migrating to opensaml 2.2.0, Brent Putman, 10/27/2008

List archive

RE: [OpenSAML] Migrating to opensaml 2.2.0